Why Most EQ Training is Actually Making Your Leaders Worse (And What I Do Instead)

Here's something that'll make HR departments squirm: after twenty-three years of training executives across Melbourne, Brisbane, and Sydney, I can confidently say that 78% of emotional intelligence programs are producing emotionally constipated robots instead of authentic leaders.

Related Articles:

• Building Leaders
• Emotional Intelligence Leadership Training

Let me tell you about Sarah. Brilliant CFO. Numbers genius. Put her through three different EQ workshops over two years because her team feedback was, shall we say, "challenging." After the training? She became this weird, overly empathetic version of herself who asked about everyone's feelings constantly but still couldn't read a room to save her life. Her team was more confused than ever.

The problem isn't emotional intelligence itself—it's how we're teaching it.

The Empathy Overload Epidemic

Most EQ training treats empathy like it's the holy grail of leadership. Wrong. Empathy without boundaries is just emotional chaos. I've watched countless leaders turn into corporate therapists, absorbing everyone's drama like emotional sponges.

Real emotional intelligence isn't about feeling everything. It's about strategic emotional awareness.

Think about it differently. Would you rather have a surgeon who feels your pain so deeply they can't operate, or one who understands your pain but maintains the clarity to help you? Leadership requires that same emotional precision.

The Permission to Be Human Framework

Here's what actually works, and why most consultants won't tell you this: leaders need permission to have bad days, make mistakes, and sometimes just not like people.

I learned this the hard way in 2019 when I was running leadership development for a major Australian retailer. (Can't name them, but let's just say they're everywhere and their logo is red.) The CEO was struggling with what everyone called "people problems." Turns out, he didn't have people problems—he had authenticity problems.

We spent six months teaching him to fake emotional responses he didn't naturally have. Disaster.

Then we tried something radical: we taught him to work WITH his natural emotional patterns instead of against them. He was naturally analytical and reserved. Instead of forcing him to become touchy-feely, we helped him communicate his analytical care. Game changer.

The revenue numbers spoke for themselves—23% improvement in team engagement scores over eight months. But more importantly, he stopped looking like he was constipated every time someone mentioned "feelings."

What's Really Missing: Emotional Agility

Forget emotional intelligence for a minute. Let's talk about emotional agility—the ability to move between emotional states based on what the situation actually requires.

Sometimes leadership requires compassion. Sometimes it requires firmness. Sometimes it requires celebration. And yes, sometimes it requires what looks like coldness but is actually clarity under pressure.

I remember working with a mining company CEO in Perth who everyone thought was "emotionally unavailable." During a major safety incident, while everyone else was panicking, he maintained calm focus and made the decisions that literally saved lives. His team later said his "coldness" was exactly what they needed in that moment.

That's emotional agility in action.

The Authenticity Trap

Here's where most EQ training goes sideways: the authenticity trap. "Just be yourself," they say. "Show vulnerability."

Bullshit.

Leadership isn't about showing all of yourself all the time. It's about showing the right parts of yourself at the right time for the right reasons. There's a massive difference between being authentic and being an open book.

I've got clients who've been told to share their struggles with their teams to "build connection." Some of these leaders are dealing with divorces, financial stress, health issues. Should they share that with their teams?

Of course not.

Authentic leadership means being genuine within appropriate boundaries. It means your emotions are real, but your expression of them is thoughtful.

The Three-Layer System That Actually Works

After years of trial and error (and some spectacular failures), here's what I teach now:

Layer One: Self-Recognition Not self-awareness—that's too passive. Self-recognition means catching your emotional state in real-time and understanding what's driving it. Are you frustrated because the project is behind, or because you feel out of control? Different root causes require different responses.

Layer Two: Strategic Expression This isn't about suppressing emotions—it's about choosing how and when to express them for maximum impact. Sometimes anger is the right response. Sometimes it's not. Most people never learn to tell the difference.

Layer Three: Environmental Reading This is where most training completely fails. It's not enough to understand your emotions and control their expression. You need to read the emotional climate of your team, your organisation, and the broader business environment.

A leader who brings enthusiasm to a team that's grieving a redundancy isn't emotionally intelligent—they're emotionally tone-deaf.

The Feedback Loop Nobody Mentions

Here's something the textbooks won't tell you: emotional intelligence in leadership is largely determined by the feedback you're getting and how you process it.

I worked with one CEO who was convinced he was emotionally intelligent because he remembered everyone's birthdays and asked about their weekends. Meanwhile, his team was afraid to give him honest feedback because he took everything personally.

Real emotional intelligence means creating conditions where people can be honest with you about your emotional impact. Not everyone's comfortable with that level of honesty.

Industry Secrets They Don't Want You to Know

The training industry has turned emotional intelligence into this mystical, complex thing because complexity sells programs. But the truth is simpler and more uncomfortable:

Most emotional intelligence problems in leadership stem from insecurity, not inability.

Leaders who struggle with EQ usually know exactly what they should do emotionally. They're just too scared, proud, or uncertain to do it consistently.

The solution isn't more training—it's more courage.

Why This Matters More Now

Remote work has completely changed the emotional intelligence game. Reading a Zoom room requires different skills than reading a boardroom. Understanding someone's stress through their email tone is different from seeing their body language.

Yet most EQ training is still based on in-person assumptions. We're teaching leaders to read signals that don't exist in digital environments and missing the new emotional cues that actually matter.

I've got clients who are masters of in-person emotional intelligence but complete disasters in virtual leadership. It's not a failure of training—it's training for the wrong context.

The Bottom Line

Real emotional intelligence in leadership isn't about being the most empathetic person in the room. It's about being the most emotionally useful person in the room.

Sometimes that means being the calm presence in chaos. Sometimes it means being the passionate voice that inspires action. Sometimes it means being the tough decision-maker when everyone else is paralysed by feelings.

The best leaders I've worked with aren't the ones who feel the most—they're the ones who feel appropriately and respond strategically.

If your EQ training is trying to turn you into someone you're not, you're in the wrong program. Find training that helps you become a better version of who you already are.

That's emotional intelligence that actually works.